Evaluation of ten SNP Markers for Human Identification and Paternity Analysis in Persian Population

Document Type : Brief Report


1 Human Genetic Research Center, Baqiatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Genetics, Faculty of Sciences, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

3 Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


Background: DNA markers are inevitable tools of human identification in forensic science. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are one category of these markers which is concerned to use especially in the case of degraded DNA because of their short amplicons.
Objectives: Detection of highly informative SNPs by the criteria is the essential step to develop a useful panel of SNP markers. The purpose of this work is to get high informative SNPs for human identification in Persian ethnic of the Iranian population.
Material and Methods: Genotype and allele frequencies of 10 SNPs from the SNPforID browser were determined by a PCR-RFLP method on 100 samples that was taken from 100 unrelated Persian people.
Results: These ten SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P value > 0.1) except rs1355366 (P value = 0.02) and Heterozygosity of seven SNPs is greater than 0.45 but minor allele frequency of only four SNPs is more than 0.45. According to criteria only three SNPs rs1454361, rs2111980 and rs2107612 can pass all standards and are highly informative in population for forensic uses.
Conclusions: Our data showed that the CPI (Combined probability of Identity) and CPE (Combined Power of Exclusion) for ten SNPs are 1.13 E-04 and 0.809 respectively. It was also showed based on the criteria only three SNPs (rs2107612, rs1454361 and rs2111980) are highly informative in Persian population. If we can find 39 SNPs with PE and PI close to PE and PI of these three SNPs (rs2107612, rs1454361 and rs2111980), we will be able to use of these 39 SNPs in human identification with sufficient power of discrimination.


Main Subjects

1.           Roper SM, Tatum OL. Forensic aspects of DNA-based human identity testing. J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(4):150-156. pmid: 19418771
2.           Lygo JE, Johnson PE, Holdaway DJ, Woodroffe S, Whitaker JP, Clayton TM, et al. The validation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci for use in forensic casework. Int J Legal Med. 1994;107(2):77-89. pmid: 7819123
3.           Butler JM, Coble MD, Vallone PM. STRs vs. SNPs: thoughts on the future of forensic DNA testing. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2007;3(3):200-205. doi: 10.1007/s12024-007-0018-1 pmid: 25869164
4.           Sobrino B, Brion M, Carracedo A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154(2-3):181-194. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.020 pmid: 16182964
5.           Budowle B, van Daal A. Forensically relevant SNP classes. Biotechniques. 2008;44(5):603-608, 610. doi: 10.2144/000112806 pmid: 18474034
6.           Boonyarit H, Mahasirimongkol S, Chavalvechakul N, Aoki M, Amitani H, Hosono N, et al. Development of a SNP set for human identification: A set with high powers of discrimination which yields high genetic information from naturally degraded DNA samples in the Thai population. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;11:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.010 pmid: 24747184
7.           Amigo J, Phillips C, Lareu M, Carracedo A. The SNPforID browser: an online tool for query and display of frequency data from the SNPforID project. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(5):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0233-7 pmid: 18491122
8.           Lee HY, Park MJ, Yoo JE, Chung U, Han GR, Shin KJ. Selection of twenty-four highly informative SNP markers for human identification and paternity analysis in Koreans. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;148(2-3):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.073 pmid: 15639604
9.           Martin P, Garcia O, Heinrichs B, Yurrebaso I, Aguirre A, Alonso A. Population genetic data of 30 autosomal indels in Central Spain and the Basque Country populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7(2):e27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.10.003 pmid: 23138099
10.        Rodriguez S, Gaunt TR, Day IN. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing of biological ascertainment for Mendelian randomization studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(4):505-514. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn359 pmid: 19126586
11.        Kim JJ, Han BG, Lee HI, Yoo HW, Lee JK. Development of SNP-based human identification system. Int J Legal Med. 2010;124(2):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s00414-009-0389-9 pmid: 19921517
12.        Luftig MA, Richey S. DNA and forensic science. New Eng Rev. 2000;35:609.
13.        Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Grigorenko EL, Kajuna SL, Karoma NJ, et al. Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;164(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.017 pmid: 16360294
14.        Phillips C, Fondevila M, Garcia-Magarinos M, Rodriguez A, Salas A, Carracedo A, et al. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;2(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002 pmid: 19083821
15.        Moreno F, Freire-Aradas A, Phillips C, Fondevila M, Carracedo A, Lareu MV. SNP variation with latitude: Analysis of the SNPforID 52-plex markers in north, mid-region and south Chilean populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;10:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.009 pmid: 24680124
16.        Musgrave-Brown E, Ballard D, Balogh K, Bender K, Berger B, Bogus M, et al. Forensic validation of the SNPforID 52-plex assay. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007;1(2):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.01.004 pmid: 19083753
17.        Shepard EM, Herrera RJ. Iranian STR variation at the fringes of biogeographical demarcation. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;158(2-3):140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.05.012 pmid: 15998573
18.        Gill P. An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med. 2001;114(4-5):204-210. pmid: 11355396
19.        Krawczak M. Informativity assessment for biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms. Electrophoresis. 1999;20(8):1676-1681. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8 pmid: 10435431