Degenerate Primers Facilitate the Detection and Identification of Potyviruses From the Northwest Region of Iran

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, IR Iran, Tabriz, IR Iran

2 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, IR Iran

Abstract

Background: Potyviruses are accounted for 40% of viral diseases of various crops including vegetables and legumes. Potyviruses can be transmitted through plant sap, seeds and many aphid species. Due to ease of spread of these viruses detection of such viruses are crucial as to the control of the incited diseases. Objectives: This study compared the efficiencies of two couples of primers in their detection of potyviruses infecting vegetables in North-West of Iran. Materials and Methods: To identify potyviruses infecting vegetables, total RNA preparations from leaves of diseased plants were subjected to reverse transcription (RT) with oligo d(T)15, M4T or a potyvirus-specific primer, followed by polymerase chain reactions (PCR) with two pairs of degenerate primers including Sprimer/M4 or NIb2F/NIb3R that would yield ~ 1700 or 350 bp fragments, respectively. Amplification was achieved from 7 samples when Sprimer and M4 were used, but non- specific fragments were also amplified. However, specific amplifications from 31 samples were achieved with NIb2F2 and NIb3R. PCR products resulting from the use of NIb2F/NIb3R were subjected for cloning and sequencing. Results: BLAST analysis of the sequenced data revealed that the PCR-amplified fragments belonged to Bean common mosaic virus (green bean), Bean yellow mosaic virus (broad bean), Potato virus Y (potato), Watermelon mosaic virus (squash, muskmelon or melon), Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (squash), and Soybean mosaic virus (bean). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the efficiency of NIb2F2/NIb3R in detection of potyviruses and revealed the extent of infections with diverse potyviruses species in the northwest part of Iran.

Keywords


1. Background

 

The genus Potyvirus in the family Potyviridae is one of the largest plant virus genera (1) that are accounted for 40% of losses caused by all plant viruses (2). It includes 111 confirmed species and 86 tentative species (3-5). Potyviruses are transmitted by aphids, especially species of Aphidinae (6). Potyvirus particles are flexuous and rod-shaped, 11 - 15 nm in diameter and 680-900 nm in length and are made up of a single structural protein surrounding an RNA molecule of approximately 10000 nucleotides (nts) (7, 8). The only open reading frame (ORF) of the virus genome codes for a single large polyprotein that is co- and post-translationally processed into 10 functional proteins (9). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with degenerate primers has facilitated the detection of many potyviruses and enabled partial genomic sequencing. Attempts have been made to design universal primers to detect all potyviruses since early 1990s (7, 10-16). An analysis of the seventeen most conserved sites within potyvirus genomes has revealed a decay in their consensus as newly generated sequences resulted in an apparent loss of stability and less efficiencies of previously designed degenerate primers (17). However, NIb2F and NIb3R have been reported as the more efficient primer pair compared to other primers (5).

2. Objectives

 

This study was carried out to compare the efficiencies of two couples of primers in their detection of potyviruses infecting vegetables in North-West of Iran.

3. Materials and Methods

 

Leaves showing characteristic symptoms of virus infection including mosaic, mottling, leaf and fruit malformation and green blistering, and ring patterns on fruits were collected from vegetables during the years 2009 and 2010. Samples were preserved on calcium chloride granules at 4 °C and then stored at -20 °C until processing. Inoculations were done on diagnostic and propagation hosts including Chenopodium amaranticolor, Cucurbita pepo, Phaseolus vulgaris and Nicotiana tabacum. Total RNA was extracted from the original (field samples) or the infected experimental hosts using ‘Method 4' of Rowhani et al. (18) with some modifications as reported elsewhere (19). Two primer pairs including Sprimer/M4 (11) or NIb2F/NIb3R (17) were used in the PCR reactions. Reverse transcription (RT) was done with Oligo d(T)15, M4T (5'GTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC(T)153') or NIb3R (5'TCIACIACIGTIGAIGGYTGNCC3'). Sprimer (5'GGNAAYAAYAGYGGNCAZCC3'), NIb2F (5'GTITGYGTIGAYGAYTTYAAYAA3') and NIb3R corresponded to NIb (nuclear inclusion protein b) coding region in the potyvirus genome. M4 (5'GTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC3') is an adaptor primer designed to anneal to the very 3’ end of the potyvirus genome right before the poly (A) tail. Moloney Murine Leukemia virus (M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase (Fermentas, Lithuania) was used in the synthesis as described elsewhere (20). PCR reactions were done in 25 µL or 12.5 µL containing 20 pmol of each primer, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Lithuania), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2 and 2 µL of the synthesized cDNA. PCR with Sprimer/M4 was performed with an initial denaturation at 94 ºC for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94 ºC for 30 sec, 47 ºC for 1 min and 72 ºC for 2 min; then a final polymerization at 72 ºC for 10 min. PCR with NIb2F/NIb3R was performed similarly, but annealing was at 45 ºC and duration of the denaturation, annealing and extension was 45 sec for each. Some optimizations were done to improve efficiencies of the PCR reactions as follows; different quantities of the primers (1, 1.5, 2 or 3 pmol final concentrations) and cDNA (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 or 3 µL per 25 µL reaction mix) were used with ‘Hot-start’ (20, 21) or ‘Touch down’ (22) PCR methods when Sprimer and M4 were applied. In the ‘Touch down’ PCR, the annealing temperature was gradually decreased from 60 ºC to 47 ºC during the first 13 cycles, then other 22 cycles with annealing at 47 ºC were appllied. In PCR with NIb2F/NIb3R, initially a 0.5 pmol (final concentration) of each primer was used, but in the next runs this was increased 10 times to 5 pmol of each primer.

4. Results

 

PCR with Sprimer/M4 on subsamples of 15 samples resulted in amplification of the expected ~1700 bp fragment from 7 samples (data not shown). However, three other fragments with smaller sizes were also produced. There were samples from which no targeted fragment was produced, but instead smaller non targeted fragments were generated. Even the optimizations did not improve efficiency and specificity of the PCR. However, PCR with NIb2F/NIb3R on 61 symptomatic samples resulted in amplification of the expected 350 bp fragment from 31 samples (Table 1). The amplification was faint when the primers were used at 0.5 pmol, whereas an intense band was amplified with 5 pmol of the primers. Among the tested samples, there were 4 samples that gave the expected fragments with either of the two primer sets (Table 1). PCR products amplified by Sprimer/M4 were not subjected to cloning and subsequent sequencing since they were faint. However, sixteen out of the thirty-one PCR products resulting from amplification with NIb2F/NIb3R were selected for cloning and sequencing. These included isolates A74, A185, A186, A187, A206, A213, T41, T67, T172, T180, T192, T198, T205, T209, T210 and U167 which were from different hosts and geographical locations. PCR products with the expected size from these isolates were purified from agarose gel by the use of Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Fermentas, Lihuania) and then ligated into pTZ57R/T (Fermentas, Lithuania) following the manufacturers' instructions. The ligated mixture was transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5α cells which had been made competent according to Chung et al. (23). Plasmid DNA was extracted from overnight culture of the resulting white colonies using the small-scale alkaline lysis method (24) or Qiagene Miniprep Kit. Integration of the PCR products into the vector was confirmed by restriction analysis. The cloned fragments were then subjected to dideoxy terminator cycle sequencing in Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). The sequencing data were submitted to BLASTN (Basic Local Total Alignment Search Tool- Nucleotide) (25) facility in the NCBI website (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to identify the best matching sequences recorded in GenBank. The cloned isolates were considered to be potyvirus provided that they matched a potyvirus sequence in GenBank in the expected NIb region. According to the demarcation criteria established for potyvirus by the ICTV if there is < 85% nucleotide identity between the two isolates they are considered as distinct potyviruses. At the level of amino acid sequences, < 80% identity means that the isolates are distinct potyviruses (4). The BLASTN revealed A74, A185 and Adb-pot187 as the most similar sequences to Potato virus Y (PVY); A186, A206, A213, T41, cT180, T192, T205 and U167 to Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV); T172 to Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV); T67 to Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV); T209 to Soybean mosaic virus (SMV); and T210 to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV). Overall, these similarities were above 97%. These newly identified isolates were named as PVY isolates Adb-Glr-pot74 (JX683528), Hir-pot185 (JX683529) and pot187 (JF707767); WMV isolates Nia-pot186 (JX683531), Aga-Sq206 (not submitted to GenBank due to its short length), Glr-pot213 (JX683534), Gow-Sq41 (JX124710), Kha-Msk180 (JX124711), Gmk-Msk192 (JX683530), Ahr-sq205 (JF707768) and Zei-Sq167 (JX124709); BCMV isolate Mgh-Bn172 (JF707770); BYMV isolate Ghk-Brn67 (JF707769), SMV isolate Ahr-bn209 (JX843813); and ZYMV isolate Gmk-sq210 (JX843814) (Figure 1). The closest previously reported accessions to the isolates reported in this study are presented in Table 2. However, the sequence from sample T198 seemed to have a host plant origin because it matched the Vitis vinifera (grapevine) hypothetical protein gene.

Phylogenetic analysis was performed to reconfirm the potyvirus affiliation of the newly identified isolates. First, by the use of GeneDoc software (26), sequences of the new isolates were aligned with counterpart regions of the previously characterized potyvirus species and Ryegrass mosaic virus (RGMV) was set as the outgroup (Table 3). Then, a phylogeneic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates was generated by the use of Treecon (27) on the basis of Jukes-Cantor distance method (28). As a result, each new isolate was clustered with the same most similar virus as that determined by the BLASTN analysis (Figure 2). This provided further proof for the potyvirus affiliation of the isolates.

Branches with < 500 bootstrap values were collapsed. Branch lengths are proportional to genetic distances. Ryegrass mosaic virus (RGMV) is designated as the root. The newly detected potyvirus species/isolates from Iran are bolded.
Here, infections with potyviruses were detected in 31 of 60 samples. By selection of appropriate representative isolates according to the origin and host, distinct species were intercepted. We showed that when testing for potyviruses even in new locations, the primer pair NIb2F/NIb3R was the most efficient and specific. Consistent amplification of a 350 bp fragment for majority of the isolates was in agreement with Zheng et al. (5). Because these primers target highly conserved sites in the genome, they resulted in successful detection of potyviruses from Iran. However, amplification with Sprimer/M4 was not satisfactory because it was achieved from a relatively smaller number of samples and was always associated with non-specific bands. This primer pair was tested for 15 samples, which resulted in amplification of the expected 1700 bp as well as non specific fragments from 7 samples.

5. Discussion

 

Results from this study justifies attempts that have been made to design potyvirus degenerate primers (7, 11, 12, 14-16). However, one major issue is that at any time the number of characterized (partiallly or completely sequenced) potyviruses is smaller than that which would be known in future thus as more and more new potyvirus sequences are accumulating it appears that the previously characterized conserved regions are not as much conserved as they were once thought. In other words, the consistency of conserved sites decays and, as a result, the previously designed degenerate primers fall short in detecting some potyvirus members. Accordingly, because Sprimer and M4 were designed about a decade ago when a relatively smaller number of potyvirus sequences were available they appear to be inefficient in detection. The other factor may be the geographical origins of the isolates especially from places where no detailed studies have been done before. Here, we studied samples from the northwest region of Iran where no potyvirus sequence has previously been recorded to consider in design of the primers. So, the newly characterized isolates may be well heterogeneous at the Sprimer site resulting in a non specific and inefficient amplification with Sprimer/M4. Compared to detection by serological methods, RT-PCR with broad spectrum primers offers cost-effectiveness, particularly in developing countries where antibodies to each virus are imported with considerable costs. Although a genus-specific antibody (antipoty) has become available there are yet some advantages for PCR with broad spectrum primers. With the genus specific antibody, one major problem can be cross reactivity between distinct potyvirus species (29), hindering species determination, whereas PCR with subsequent sequencing of the amplified fragment results in prudent identification of potyvirus species. There were also diseased samples that did not contain potyvirus as determined by RT-PCR suggesting that another virus (es) might be involved in these infections or distant genotypes of potyvirus with respect to the primer sites might be occurring in them. Because there has been no previous record of potyvirus sequence data from this geographical region it is possible that some distantly related potyviruses exist in the region that do not match the primers.Amplification from sample T198 appeared to have been derived from the host genome because the sequence data did not match any virus, but the host plant genome. Such a non targeted amplification has also been reported by Zheng et al (5) although without elaboration. Therefore, it seems that there are sites in the host genome complementary enough to pair with the primer sequences.The future direction would be the characterization of the newly identified species to understand the heterogeneity of their genotype with respect to the primers and design newer primers for improvement of detection.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support given to this project by The Graduate Office and Research Grant Office of The University of Tabriz.

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education This study has implication for researchers as well as virologists.

Please cite this paper as Sokhandan-Bashir N, Ghasemzadeh A, Masoudi N, Khakvar R, Farajzadeh D. Degenerate Primers Facilitate Detection and Identification of Potyviruses From the Northwest Region of Iran. Iran J Biotech. 2013: 11(2):in press. DOI: 10.5812/ijb.11213

Authors’ Contribution Nemat Sokhandan-Bashir acted as the principle investigator (supervisor), Aisan Ghasemzadeh and N. Masoudi did the lab works, Reza Khakvar and D. Farajzadeh acted as associate supervisors.

Financial Disclosure There is not any conflict of interest.

Funding/ Support Funding for this project was supported from Graduate Office and Research Grant Office of the University of Tabriz.

  • 1. King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011. 1327 pp.
  • 2. Yamamoto H, Fuji S. Rapid determination of the nucleotide sequences of potyviral coat protein genes using semi-nested RT-PCR with universal primers. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2008;74(2):97-100. [DOI]
  • 3. Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Beaudoin F. Overview and analysis of the polyprotein cleavage sites in the family Potyviridae. Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;6(4):471-87. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4. Fauquet CM, Mayo MA. The Viruses. Virus Taxonomy. San Diego: Academic Press; 2005. 9 pp. ISBN 978-0-12-249951-7. [DOI]
  • 5. Zheng L, Rodoni BC, Gibbs MJ, Gibbs AJ. A novel pair of universal primers for the detection of potyviruses. Plant Pathol. 2010;59(2):211-220. [DOI]
  • 6. Gibbs AJ, Ohshima K, Phillips MJ, Gibbs MJ. The prehistory of potyviruses: their initial radiation was during the dawn of agriculture. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):ee2523 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7. Colinet D, Kummert J. Identification of a sweet potato feathery mottle virus isolate from China (SPFMV-CH) by the polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers. J Virol Methods. 1993;45(2):149-59. [PubMed]
  • 8. Mayo MA. The Potyviridae. New Phytologist. 1995;131(2):289-90. [DOI]
  • 9. Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Fauquet CM. Molecular criteria for genus and species discrimination within the family Potyviridae. Arch Virol. 2005;150(3):459-79. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10. Ha C, Coombs S, Revill PA, Harding RM, Vu M, Dale JL. Design and application of two novel degenerate primer pairs for the detection and complete genomic characterization of potyviruses. Arch Virol. 2008;153(1):25-36. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11. Chen J, Adams MJ. A universal PCR primer to detect members of the Potyviridae and its use to examine the taxonomic status of several members of the family. Arch Virol. 2001;146(4):757-66. [PubMed]
  • 12. Gibbs A, Mackenzie A. A primer pair for amplifying part of the genome of all potyvirids by RT-PCR. J Virol Methods. 1997;63(1-2):9-16. [PubMed]
  • 13. Rossolini GM, Cresti S, Ingianni A, Cattani P, Riccio ML, Satta G. Use of deoxyinosine-containing primers vs degenerate primers for polymerase chain reaction based on ambiguous sequence information. Mol Cell Probes. 1994;8(2):91-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14. Pappu SS, Brand R, Pappu HR, Rybicki EP, Gough KH, Frenkel MJ, et al. A polymerase chain reaction method adapted for selective amplification and cloning of 3' sequences of potyviral genomes: application to dasheen mosaic virus. J Virol Methods. 1993;41(1):9-20. [PubMed]
  • 15. Langeveld SA, Dore JM, Memelink J, Derks AF, van der Vlugt CI, Asjes CJ, et al. Identification of potyviruses using the polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers. J Gen Virol. 1991;72 ( Pt 7):1531-41. [PubMed]
  • 16. Nicolas O, Laliberte JF. The use of PCR for cloning of large cDNA fragments of turnip mosaic potyvirus. J Virol Methods. 1991;32(1):57-66. [PubMed]
  • 17. Zheng L, Wayper PJ, Gibbs AJ, Fourment M, Rodoni BC, Gibbs MJ. Accumulating variation at conserved sites in potyvirus genomes is driven by species discovery and affects degenerate primer design. PLoS One. 2008;3(2):ee1586 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18. Rowhani A, Chay C, Golino DA, Falk BW. Development of a polymerase chain reaction technique for the detection of Grapevine fanleaf virus in Grapevine tissue. Phytopathology. 1993;83:749-53. [DOI]
  • 19. Bashir NS, Hajizadeh M. Survey for Grapevine fanleaf virus in vineyards of north-west Iran and genetic diversity of isolates. Austral Plant Pathol. 2007;36(1):46-52. [DOI]
  • 20. Bashir NS, Khabbazi AD, Torabi E. Isolation of the gene coding for movement protein from Grapevine fanleaf virus. Iran J Biotech. 2009;7(4):258-61.
  • 21. Chou Q, Russell M, Birch DE, Raymond J, Bloch W. Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(7):1717-23. [PubMed]
  • 22. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(14):4008. [PubMed]
  • 23. Chung CT, Niemela SL, Miller RH. One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(7):2172-5. [PubMed]
  • 24. Sambrook J, Russell DW. In: 3rd , editor(s). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Laboratory Press; 2001.
  • 25. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389-402. [PubMed]
  • 26. Nicholas KB, Nicholas HBJ. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Distributed by the author. http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc. 1997.
  • 27. Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R. Construction of evolutionary distance trees with TREECON for Windows: accounting for variation in nucleotide substitution rate among sites. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13(3):227-30. [PubMed]
  • 28. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Mammalian Protein Metabolism. In: Munro HN, editor(s). Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). New York: Elsevier Academic; 1969. p. 21-132. 
  • 29. Joisson C, Dubs MC, Briand JP, Van Regenmortel MH. Detection of potyviruses with antisera to synthetic peptides. Res Virol. 1992;143(3):167-78. [PubMed]