Cloning and Expression of VP2 Gene of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Eukaryotic Cells

Document Type: Brief Report

Authors

1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, P.O. Box 65355-141, Ahvaz, I.R. Iran

2 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, P.O. Box 65355-145, Ahvaz, I.R. Iran

Abstract

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is an economically important viral disease of chickens with worldwide distribution which suppresses the immune system of young chickens. VP2 is the major host-protective protein of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). The encoding region of VP2 protein was PCR amplified from a plasmid containing a cDNA fragment of large genomic segment of IBDV, strain D78. This region of 1356 bp was inserted into a eukaryotic expression plasmid, pCDNA4, under the control of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immediate early enhancer and promoter. Plasmid DNA was transfected into COS-7 cell line and transient expression of VP2 from the constructed plasmid was characterized by dot blotting with a polyclonal antibody to IBDV.

Keywords


Infectious bursal disease (IBD), also popularly known as Gumboro disease, is an acute, contagious viral disease of chicken (Kibenge et al., 1988), caused by a double-stranded RNA virus of the Birnaviridae family (Murphy et al., 1995). The genome of IBD virus (IBDV) consists of two segments, designated A and B. Segment A contains two overlapping open reading frames (ORF). The larger ORF of the segment encodes a polyprotein consisting of VP2, VP4 and VP3. VP2 is a major capsid protein eliciting neutralizing antibodies. Segment B codes for a 97 kDa protein, designated as VP1, which represents the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Kibenge et al., 1991).
IBDV targets the lymphoid tissue of chickens, mainly the bursa of fabricious, causing severe bursal damage, and consequently suppresses the immune system. Thus, IBD is of major economic importance to the poultry industry. Following the appearance of so virulent strains of IBDV, it was evident that conventional IBDV vaccines could not protect chickens and therefore, less attenuated intermediate and hot vaccines were developed.  These vaccines may have some pathogenic characters and induce moderate bursal atrophy. In addition, they might be able to revert to a virulent state (Tsukamoto et al., 1995; Lukert and Saif, 1997).
    In order to circumvent the potential disadvantages of live vaccines against IBDV, many studies have been performed to develop more potent vaccines, based on recombinant DNA technology (Jagadish et al. 1988,  Goudarzi et al., 2006; Shaw and Davison, 2000).
      In the 1990s, an entirely new type of vaccine (DNA vaccines) was first described (Wolff et al., 1990;Robinson et al., 1993; Ulmer et al., 1993). These new vaccines used naked plasmid DNA to express foreign proteins in the host. DNA vaccines are specially modified bacterial plasmids that usually have an Escherichia coli origin of replication, an antibiotic resistant gene, eukaryotic promoter that drives the expression of the target gene, a target gene and a polyadenylation signal sequence. The target gene usually codes for an antigenic protein from a pathogenic infectious organism. Since these initial reports on this novel vaccine technology, DNA vaccines have been successfully used to immunize a number of different animal species against a multitude of infectious agents (Corr et al., 1996; Sakaguchi et al., 1996; Scholz et al., 1993; Fynan et al., 1993) DNA vaccines have also been successfully used in poultry to immunize against several pathogens (Robinson et al., 1993; Sakaguchi et al., 1996; Fynan et al., 1993).
     E. coli strain TOP10F’ was cultured routinely at    37 ºC in broth or on agar plates of LB medium supplemented, with 50 µg/ml ampicillin, if required . A plasmid DNA (pTZ57RVP2) containing the VP2 cDNA of IBDV, strain D78 (Goudarzi et al., 2006)) was used for PCR amplification of VP2 cDNA. A eukaryotic expression vector, pCDNA4, was applied for cloning and expression of VP2 gene in eukaryotic cells.  COS-7, a fibroblast-like cell line, transformed by an origin-defective mutant of SV40 which codes for wild-type T antigen of SV40 was used in transfection studies. This cell line was cultured in Dolbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2.
     The plasmid DNA pTZ57RVP2 was extracted from bacterial strain TOP10F’ by Roche Plasmid Mini preparation Kit. The VP2 coding region of this plasmid was amplified by forward (5´-GCCGGAATTCATGACAAACCTGCAAGAT-3´) and reverse (5´-GCCGTCTAGAAACCTTATGGCCCGGAT-3´) oligonucleotide primers designed for cloning of the gene in pCDNA4 plasmid, downstream of a 6× Histidines tag sequence. The first ATG and the C-terminal stop codons of VP2 are underlined.  For directional cloning, EcoRI and XbaI restriction sites were added at the 5´ ends of the forward and reverse primers, respectively. The cycling parameters were an initial denaturation at 100ºC for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95ºC for 1 min, annealing at 58ºC for 1 min and extension at 72ºC for 1 min. The final cycle was followed by a long extension at 72ºC for 10 min. The amplified VP2 fragment (1365bp) and pCDNA4 vector were digested with EcoRI and XbaI and ligated after purification from a 1% agarose gel. The resulting DNA construct was designated as pCDNA4VP2 and used for transformation of competent TOP10F’ E. coli cells. In order to confirm that no errors were introduced as a result of PCR amplification, complete sequence of VP2, inserted in pCDNA4 was determined by sequencing from two directions by vector specific primers and compared with the sequence of VP2 gene of IBDV, strain D78 (accession no. AF499929).
    COS-7 cells were transfected by pCDNA4VP2 to verify protein expression. The cells cultured in 25cm3 flasks were transfected with 20 µg plasmid DNA, using lipofectTM Transfection Reagent (Qiagene), as the manufacturer instructions. To verify expression, several clones were tested, due to the differences in expression levels of clones.
      The cells were maintained as described above and zeocin was used for selection, 24 h post-transfection. The monolayers were then incubated for another 24 h to obtain maximum expression of VP2.
     Twenty four hours after antibiotic selection, liopfected COS-7 cells were harvested by scraping, suspended in PBS and pelleted at 1200 xg. After three cycles of freeze-thaw to disrupt the cells, a short centrifugation was performed and the supernatant was used as antigen in dot blotting. Nitrocellulose membranes dotted with the antigen were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS. VP2 protein was detected using a polyclonal chicken anti-IBDV serum (1:50 dilution), a goat anti-chicken IgG (H+L) peroxidase conjugate (1:30 dilution) and 4-chloro-1 Naphtol (Sigma, USA) peroxidase substrate. Polyclonal and conjugate sera have been produced by KPL company (USA). COS-7 cells, transfected with pCDNA4 were treated in the same manner and used as negative control.
     The complete part of segment A encoding the VP2 protein of IBDV strain D78 was successfully amplified with designated primers, from the plasmid pTZ57RVP2. The amplified fragment was ligated to pCDNA4 vector and used for transformation of Ecoli strain TOP10F’. The identity of the insert was confirmed by sequencing. Alignment of the insert sequence with the original sequence of VP2 gene of IBDV strain D78 (AF499929) did not show significant differences (Fig. 1).
      In order to determine the expression of VP2 in the eukaryotic system, pCDNA4VP2 construct was lipofected in COS-7 cells. The protein expression was detected by dot blotting, on the lysate of the cells, using a polyclonal anti-IBDV chicken serum. The  strong reaction of antiserum with the lysate of cells lipofcted with pCDNA4VP2, compared to reaction with lysate of cells lipofected with pCDNA4 (the control), indicated that the protein was successfully expressed (Fig. 2).  
      IBDV still remains a serious problem for commercial broiler producers. Vaccination is the major tool for the prevention and control of IBD in the poultry industry, but the chickens vaccinated with conventional IBDV vaccines are not fully protected against challenge with the very virulent strains of IBDV. Therefore, a safer and more efficacious vaccine to control IBD is essential.
      Attempts have been made to generate subunit vaccines, by expression of VP2 or virus polyprotein in Ecoli (Jagadish et al., 1988) and yeast (Pitcovski et al., 2003; Goudarzi et al., 2006). Recombinant fowlpox viruses containing the genetic material of IBDV have also been developed and tested (Shaw and Davison, 2000). 
      In recent years several groups have tried the DNA vaccination approach targeting the polyprotein or VP2 of IBDV (Chang et al., 2001; Fodor and Fodor, 1999; Hsieh et al., 2007; Mahmood et al., 2006). DNA vaccination as an alternative approach to vaccinate and protect chickens against IBD has been pursued with some positive and promising results (Hsieh et al., 2007, Tang and Johnston, 1992). Application of CpG-ODN as DNA vaccine adjuvant (Mahmood et al., 2006), use of bacteria for efficient delivery of DNA vaccine (Mahmood et al., 2007; Li et al., 2006) and boosting the immune system by a killed vaccine, after using the DNA vaccine (Hsieh et al., 2007), all have been shown to enhance the efficacy of IBD DNA vaccines.
      Efficacy of IBD DNA vaccine may also depend to other features, like amount of the expressed protein and duration of in vivo expression. In this study, we decided to use pCDNA4 as a vector for expression of IBDV VP2, because it was specifically designed for protein expression in eukaryotic cells but so far, has not been used in IBD DNA vaccine constructions. The plasmid pCDNA4 which is about 5.3 kb contains the CMV promoter, ampicillin resistance gene for selection in E.coli, zeocin resistance gene for selection in eukaryotic cell lines and an upstream histidin tag for protein purification.
      Based on the results of dot immunoblotting of cells transfected by pCNA4VP2, the construct expresses the protein VP2 of IBDV, but further characterizations are needed to show its usability for in vivo expression and immunogenicity of VP2.
Acknowledgements

Special thanks are extended to those individuals and their organizations that have provided help both in time and/or in providing financial support, during the course of the project. They are: Miss Joudaki, Andashti and Daghari for valuable technical assistance, Dr Azadmanesh, Dr Mariami, and Dr. Ebne jalal for the laboratory technical support and Dr Goudarzi for preparation of some materials. National Cell Bank of Iran and plasmid and gene bank of Iran made this project possible with their financial support.

Chang HC, Lin TL, Wu CC (2001). DNA mediated vaccination against infectious bursal disease in chickens. Vaccine 20: 328-335.
Corr MD, Lee DJ, Carson DA, Tighe H (1996). Gene vaccination with naked plasmid DNA: mechanism of CTL priming. J Exp Med. 184: 1555-1560.
Fodor IHE, Fodor N (1999). Induction of protective immunity in chickens immunized with plasmid DNA encoding infectious bursal disease virus antigens. Acta Vet Hung. 47: 481-492.
Fynan EF, Webster RG, Fuller DH, Haynes JR, Santoro JC, Robinson HL (1993). DNA vaccines: protective immunizations by parenteral mucosal, and genegun inoculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90: 11478-11482.
Goudarzi H, Seyfiabad Shapouri MR, Toroghi R, Azizy M, Shahbazzadeh D, Pourbakhsh SA (2006). Expression of VP2 protein of classical infectious bursal disease virus in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Arch of Razi Inst. 61: 131-136.
Hsieh MK, Wu CC, Lin TL (2007). Priming with DNA vaccine and boosting with killed vaccine conferring protection of chickens against infectious bursal disease. Vaccine 25: 7629-7635.
Jagadish MN, Staton VJ, Hudson PJ, Azad AA (1988). Birnavirus precursor polyprotein is processed in Escherichia coli by its own virus-encoded polypeptide. J Virol. 62: 1084-1087.
Kibenge FSB, Dhillon AS, Russel RG (1988). Biochemistry and immunology of infectious bursal disease virus. J Gen Virol. 69: 1757-1775.
Kibenge FSB, Mckenna PK, Dybing JK (1991). Genomic cloning and analysis of the large RNA segment (segment A) of a naturally avirulent serotype 2 IBDV. Virology 184: 437-440.
Li L, Fang W, Li J, Fang L, Huang Y, Yu L (2006). Oral DNA vaccination with polyprotein gene of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) delivered by attenuated Salmonella elicits protective immune responses in chickens. Vaccine 24: 5919-5927.
Lukert PD, Saif YM (1997). Infectious bursal disease virus. In: Disease of Poultry, 10th Ed, Calnek, et al. ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames Iowa, PP. 721-738.
Mahmood MS, Siddique M, Hussain I, Khan A, Mansoor MK (2006). Protection capability of recombinant plasmid DNA vaccine containing VP2 gene of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus in chickens adjuvanted with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide. Vaccine 24: 4838-4846.
Mahmood MS, Hussain I, Siddique M, Akhtar M, Ali S (2007). DNA vaccination with VP2 gene of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV) delivered by transgenic E. coli DH5a given orally confers protective immune responses in chickens. Vaccine 25: 7629-7635.
Murphy FA, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL (1995). Virus taxonomy. Classification and nomenclature of virus. Six Report of International Committee on taxonomy of viruses. Arch viral suppl. 10: 1481.
Robinson HL, Hunt LA, Webster RG (1993). Protection against a lethal influenza virus challenge by immunization with a hemagglutinin-expressing plasmid DNA. Vaccine 11: 957-960.
Sakaguchi M, Nakamura H, Sonoda K, Hamada F, Hirai K (1996). Protection of chickens from Newcastle disease by vaccination with a linear plasmid DNA expressing the F protein of Newcastle disease virus. Vaccine 14: 747-752.
Scholz E, Zhang C, Guo P (1993). Transactivation of the early SV40 promoter by avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus in avian hepatoma cells. J Virol Methods. 45: 291-301.
Shaw I, Davison TF (2000). Protection from IBDV-induced bursal damage by a recombinant fowlpox vaccine, fpIBDV, is dependent on the titre of challenge virus and chicken genotype. Vaccine 18: 3230-3241.
Tang DC, Johnston SA (1992). Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response. Nature 356: 152-154.
Tsukamoto K, Tanimura N, Kakita S, Ota K, Mase M, Imai K, Hibara H (1995). Efficacy of three live vaccines against highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus and the optimum vaccination. Avian Dis. 39: 218-229.
Ulmer JB, Donnelly JJ, Parker SE, Rhodes GH, Felgner PL, Dwarki VJ, Gromkowski SH, Deck RR, Dewitt CM, Friedman A et al. (1993). Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science 259: 1745-l 749.
Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, Chong W, Acsadi G, Jani A, Felgner PL (1990). Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 247: 1465-1468.