Cadmium, Nickel and Vanadium Accumulation by Three Strains of Marine Bacteria

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Environmental Research Center, Laboratories Affairs Bureau, Pardisan Park, Hemmat highway, P.O. Box 14155-7383, Tehran, IR Iran

2 Department of Marine Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14155-775, Tehran, IR Iran and 3 Department of Microbiological Sciences, The North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 19735-148, Tehran, IR Iran

3 Department of Environment, Environmental Research Center, Laboratories Affairs Bureau, P.O. Box 14155-7383, Tehran, IR Iran and 2 Department of Marine Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14155-775, Tehran, IR Iran

Abstract

Three marine bacteria, Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1664, Bacillus cereus  PTTC 1665 and Pseudomonas pseudoalkaligenes PTCC 1666 isolated from the East Anzali wetland sediments of the Caspian Sea, were resistant to heavy metals of Cadmium (Cd), Nickel (Ni) and Vanadium (V). Pseudomonas pseudoalkaligenes PTCC 1666 was found to be resistant to all 3 metals Ni, Cd, V. Heavy metal uptake was determined in both the biomass and supernatant by the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). These bacteria showed enhanced absorption and growth in the presence of Cd and Ni at 80-100 mg/l and V at 40 mg/l concentrations. The high uptake of Cd, Ni and V was directly proportional to their respective concentrations, 5-100 mg/l for Cd and Ni and 5 - 40 mg/l for V. The maximum amount of heavy metal uptake occurred during stationary phase when cells were incubated at 30°C for 72h. The results revealed that these bacteria accumulated approximately 40-50% Cd, 5-6% Ni and 10-12% V. Bacterial cells Immobilized in alginate gel showed more efficiency in biosorbing heavy metals than free cells (80%). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results indicated that the marine bacteria were capable of accumulating several metals, showing that the isolated bacterial strains can be used as potential candidates for bioremediation, with respect to Cd, Ni and V removal from aqueous effluents.

Keywords


Heavy metals are released into the environment from a wide range of natural and anthropogenic sources. The rate of influx of these heavy metals into the environment far exceeds their removal by natural processes, thus leading to the accumulation of heavy metals in the environment, with aquatic ecosystems normally at the receiving end (Matagi et al., 1998).
       The main problems caused by the release of toxic pollutants into receiving waters are toxicity to aquatic organisms and restrictions on the human use of these waters (Jung et al., 1996). As a result of natural and industrial processes heavy metals are increasingly found in microbial habitats. Thus, microbes have evolved several mechanisms to tolerate the presence of heavy metals (by efflux, complexation, or reduction of metal ions) and they also use them as terminal electron acceptors in anaerobic respiration. The intake and subsequent efflux of heavy metal ions by microbes usually include a redox reaction involving the metal, and some bacteria can use such reactions for energy and growth. Therefore, bacteria that are resistant to and grow on metals also play an important role in the biogeochemical cycling of those metal ions (Spain and Alm, 2003). As a result of these characteristics, microbes play an important role in cleaning up or remediating metal-contaminated environments (Spain and Alm, 2003). Environmental biotechnology refers to the utilization of microorganisms to improve environmental quality (Chen et al., 2005). Although conventional technologies such as precipitation, filtration, reverse osmosis, oxidation-reduction, and membrane separation are adequate to remove the bulk of the heavy metal contamination, they are often inadequate at reducing heavy metal concentrations to acceptable regulatory standards. It becomes clear that a cost-effective secondary polishing treatment process is needed for the removal of heavy metals at dilute concentrations (Zhaohui et al., 2002). Also conventional approaches (land-filling, recycling, pyrolysis and incineration) to the remediation of contaminated sites are inefficient and costly and can also lead to the formation of toxic intermediates. Thus, biological decontamination methods are preferable to conventional approaches because, in general, microorganisms degrade numerous environmental pollutants without producing toxic intermediates (Paul et al., 2005).
     In recent years, several technologies have been developed with the aim of reducing or removing the presence of heavy metals in contaminated media. Among these technologies, those based on the use of microorganisms are of particular interest (Cabrera et al., 2005). The goal of the present investigation is to identify and isolate marine bacteria that selectively remove heavy metals such as Cd, Ni and V from waste water.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling: Sediment and water samples were collected from the East Anzali wetland of the Caspian Sea. Samples were plated onto BHI agar medium (Merck, Germany) containing 0.1M Cd (Cd (NO3)2.4H2O), 0.1M Ni (Ni (NO3)2.6H2O), 0.1M V (VCl3) and a mixture of these metals. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 72 h and colonies were randomly picked, isolated and purified as described previously (Hussein et al., 2004; Malekzadeh et al., 2002; Lyer  et al., 2004).

Preparation of heavy metal solutions: Different metal concentrations were prepared by diluting stock solutions (1000 ppm) in de-ionized water. The diluted solutions were sterilized by filtration through a flow pore filter with a 0.45 µm pore size and were used for the further preparation of different metal concentrations.

Determination of MIC and MBC: The metal-tolerance levels of the isolated bacterial strains were investigated by the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) tests (Piotrowska-Seget et al., 2005). Bacteria were grown for 72 h at 30°C in BHI agar medium containing heavy metals and used as inocula (approximately  3×108 cfu/ml). 1 ml of inocula was added to 10 ml of BHI broth medium (Merck, Germany) containing each of the three metals Cd, Ni, and V and a mixture of all of these, at the following concentrations of 10, 15, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 ppm. Each of the sets was prepared in duplicates. One set of media without metals was also inoculated and kept as controls. After inoculation, the tubes were incubated at 30°C for 72 h. The MBCs of the isolates were determined by subculturing 0.1 ml of non-turbid samples onto agar medium without metals. Colony forming unit (cfu) in each subculture was determined by the colony count method (Lyer et al., 2004).

Growth measurements: 5 ml of the different metal-resistant precultures harvested from the exponential phase of growth were transferred to 100 ml of fresh BHI broth media supplemented with the different metal ions. The flasks were incubated at 30°C by shaking at 120 rpm using a rotating shaker (Hussein et al., 2005). Bacterial growth was monitored every 24 h for 14 days, by measuring the Optical Density (OD) of the cultures at 600 nm, using a UV/Vis spectrum spectrophotometer (Hussein et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2002).

Measurement of metal accumulation: The concentration of heavy metals in both harvested cells and culture supernatants were determined as follows: For determination of the cell dry weight, bacterial cells were pelleted out of the medium by centrifuging the culture broth at 605 g for 20 min at 20°C and the cell pellets were dried at 105°C for 24 h. 4 mg dry weight of harvested cells were then mixed with 0.5 ml of concentrated nitric acid (65% suprapur) and incubated in a water bath at 100°C for 1h, after which the mixture was cooled to 25°C and made up to a final volume of 5ml with distilled water. The concentration of heavy metals (Cd, Ni and V) in the resulting 5 ml solutions and culture supernatants were measured by the Thermo Elemental Solar AAS, using a specific lamp and wavelength for each metal (Cd in 228.8 nm, Ni in 232 nm, V in 318.5 nm) (Hussein et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2002).

Immobilization of bacterial cells: Alginate solutions with a concentration range of  0.5-10% can be used for cell immobilization. In the current study, a 4% alginate (Merck, Germany) concentration was studied.  4 g of alginate was dissolved in 100 ml of BHI broth and autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. Cells were harvested during the mid-logarithmic phase of growth by centrifugation (192.5 g, 10 min), resuspended in 2 ml of phosphate buffer and added to 100 ml of sterilized alginate solution. This alginate/cell mixture (with stirring) was extruded drop by drop into a cold, sterile 0.2 M CaCl2 solution through a sterile sampler. Gel beads, approximately 2 mm in diameter were obtained (Wang, 2004; Beshay, 2003). The beads were hardened by slowly resuspending them into fresh CaCl2 solution with gentle agitation for 24h at 4°C. Finally these beads were washed with distilled water to remove excess calcium ions and free cells. The beads were then transferred to 100 ml of BHI broth containing metals and were incubated at 30°C by shaking at 120 rpm (Wang, 2004; Beshay, 2003). Culture samples were harvested every 48h and the resulting supernatants were analyzed for the presence of heavy metals by AAS.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) examinations: For morphological studies of bacterial cells immobilized in alginate beads, investigation of the internal structure of alginate beads and the search for presence of metals, the technique of SEM was used (Beshay, 2003). The alginate beads were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde (Merck, Germany) at 4°C for 24h and then rinsed with 0.2 M phosphate buffer (NaH2PO4.2H2O and Na2HPO4), pH 7.2 and fixed for another 2h in 2% osmium tetraoxide (Merck, Germany). After being washed three times in phosphate buffer, beads were dehydrated by being passed through a graded series of alcohol (30-100%) and frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen prior to freeze-drying. Dried beads were coated with gold and observed by the LEO 440i Scanning Electron Microscope (Beshay, 2003; Lopez-Jimenez and leborgne, 2003).

Semi-continuous cultures: The semi-continuous culture systems with its consistent medium delivery was used in order to investigate the stability of the alginate beads and its ability to take up metals under repeated batch cultivations. This process was carried out by decanting the spent medium every 48h and replacing it with fresh medium containing metals, in 5 cycles (Beshay, 2003), The resulting culture supernatants were analyzed by AAS.  
Effect of the ASW4 strain on wastewater containing metals: Contaminated waste that contained Cd, Ni, and V was used for metal analyses. Initially 100 ml of waste was autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min, to which the ASW4 beads were added and incubated at 30°C by shaking at 120 rpm. Culture samples were taken every 48h and their metal concentrations were measured by AAS (Wang, 2004).


RESULTS

Bacterial growth was observed in plates containing metals after 72h of incubation at 30°C (Malekzadeh et al., 2002).

Isolation of heavy metal resistant bacteria: In this preliminary screening, in total, 22 bacterial strains resistant to heavy metals were isolated from sediment samples of the East Anzali wetland of  the Caspian Sea. Isolates were maintained on BHI agar slants containing metals at 4°C and were used for subsequent studies. 5 strains were tolerant to Ni, 6 strains to Cd, 6 strains to V and 5 strains were capable of accumulating all 3 metals tested in this study.

Bacterial tolerance to metals (MIC & MBC): All isolates were examined for metal tolerance levels. 7 of the strains including ASW1, ASW1-1, ASW2-1, ASW3, ASW3-1, ASW4 and ASW4-1, showed a high tolerance to Cd, Ni and V. Characteristically, every strain isolated on medium supplemented with the specific metal showed the highest MIC for this metal, among all bacteria tested. Table 1 shows MIC and MBC values for different isolates.
Effect of growth stage and metal concentration on metal accumulation: From the 7 bacterial strains grown in BHI broth supplemented with various metals, only 3 strains grew strongly and displayed high levels of heavy metal uptake.  The amount of uptake of Cd by free ASW1 bacterial cells was 45%, Ni by free ASW1 bacterial cells was 6.5%, and V by free ASW3 bacterial cells was 10%. The amount of uptake of Cd, Ni and V were 60%, 17%, 32% respectively, by free ASW4 bacterial cells after 7 days. The highest concentration of metals taken up by bacterial strains was during the stationary phase of growth.

Heavy metal uptake by immobilized cells: The efficiency of Cd removal by ASW1 immobilized cells was 90%; Ni removal by ASW1 cells was 45%; V removal by ASW3 cells was 100% and Cd, Ni, V removal by ASW4 immobilized cells were 90%, 50% and 95%, respectively.

Comparison of metal uptake by bacterial strains as free and immobilized cells: Figure 1 shows metal uptake by the alginate immobilized cells as compared to free cells. The results show that Cd metal uptake by ASW1 immobilized cells approached 72.7 ppm after 2 days, Ni uptake by ASW1 immobilized cells approached 35.1 ppm after 5-7 days, V uptake by ASW3 immobilized cells approached 40 ppm after 5-9 days and Cd uptake approached 90.8 ppm after 2 days. In ASW4 immobilized cells, Ni uptake approached 47.5 ppm after 5 days, V uptake approached 95.6 ppm after 7 days. This activity continued to increase and reached a maximum value, at which it remained approximately constant. Thus, metal uptake by the alginate immobilized cells was 80% higher than that obtained by free cells used as the control.

Scanning electron microscopy studies: The internal and external structure of alginate beads in the presence of immobilized bacterial cells were studied by SEM. The SEM photographic plates showed that the cells were randomly distributed in alginate beads  (Fig. 3). The highest Cd, Ni and V metal concentrations were observed in regions of beads that included bacteria.

Semi-continuous culture: In the semi-continuous culture studies the operational stability of the alginate beads obtained under optimal immobilized conditions was followed during 5 cycles for the ASW4 strain (Fig. 2).
     The results, obtained after the transfer of fresh medium into previous medium at the end of the third cycle of cultivation (144h), showed a significant increase (50-90%) in Cd and Ni metal removal by entrapped cells, compared to those by free cells.
       The highest activity and uptake of metals obtained during the semi-continuous culture experiment was obtained in the third batch approximately 6 days after the start of the repeated batch cultivation. Further replacements with fresh medium did not improve levels of Cd and Ni uptake, which remained between 50-90% during the fifth cycle, after 10 days (Fig. 2).       Replacement with fresh medium containing the heavy metal V, did not enhance the uptake of the V metal during the 5 cycles (Fig. 2).
Identification of bacterial strains: Table 2 describes the identification of bacterial strains used in this study by the Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC). The PTCC Identified the bacterial strains used in this study according to Bergey,s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. The strains Identified were Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas pseudoalkaligenes and Bacillus cereus.

Efficiency of removal of heavy metals from wastewater by ASW4 strain: The amount of the uptake of Cd, Ni and V metals in wastewater containing metals (initial concentration of 100 mg/l) was investigated. The results indicated a removal efficiency of 90% for Cd; 50% for Ni and 95% for V by the ASW4 strain.


DISCUSSION

The good metal removal properties of bacterial beads in waste containing Cd, Ni and V, proved the effectiveness of bacterial beads in the widely used method of bioremediation of effluents contaminated with metals. Microorganisms, collectively, are highly diverse in metabolism, so that (theoretically) any of a wide range of pollutants can be degraded, decreased and taken up given a suitable choice of microorganisms (Hong and Shan-shan, 2005; Chen et al., 2005). The capacities of various microbes to accumulate an ample amount of metal species have been described by a number of researchers (Table 3). Microorganisms have a high surface area-to-volume ratio because of their small size and therefore, they can provide a large contact interface, which can interact with metals from the surrounding environment (Zouboalis, 2004).Thus biological decontamination methods are preferable to common physico-chemical techniques that are expensive, and inefficient. Furthermore, microorganisms generally degrade numerous environmental pollutants without producing toxic intermediates (Lyer et al., 2004; Paul et al., 2005).
     The maximum accumulation of the 3 metals was achieved when bacterial strains were in the stationary phase of growth. This has also been reported by other investigators (Pongratz and Klaus, 1999; Malekzadeh et al., 2002). In this study the highest amount of metal uptake (Cd, Ni and V) was by cells immobilized in alginate, such as the ASW4 strain (Cd 90%, Ni 50%, V 95% at an initial concentration of 100 ppm). Similar findings have also been reported by other investigators (Table 4).
      Beshay (2003) has also shown that metal uptake by immobilized cells is superior to that of free cells because it leads to higher volumetric activities within the same time of intake. Semi-continuous cultivation also showed the capacity of metal uptake by immobilized cells are 2-3 times higher than that obtained by free cells (Table 5) (Beshay, 2003).
      With the aid of SEM, it was possible to observe the random distribution of bacteria in alginate and the amount of metals (Cd, Ni, and V) present in the bacteria. These studies are in agreement with Beshay (2003) who found that the immobilized Teredinobacter turnirae cells were randomly distributed in alginate beads.
     In conclusion, the uptake of metal ions can be divided into two stages: rapid and slow stage. In the “rapid” stage, the metal ions are absorbed onto the surface of the microorganism. In the “slow” stage the metal ions are transported across the cell membrane into the cytoplasm (Hong and Shan-shan, 2005) (Table 3).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Mohseni, at the Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC) of Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, for his invaluable assistance in this project.

Beshay U (2003). Production of alkaline protease by Teredinobacter turnirae cells immobilized in ca-alginate beads. Afr J Biotech. 2:60-65.
Cabrera G, Gomez JM, Cantero D (2005). Kinetic study of ferrous sulphate oxidation of Acidic thiobacillus ferrooxidans in the presence of heavy metal ions. Enzyme Microb Tech. 36: 301-306.
Chen W, Mulchandani A, Deshusses M (2005). Environmental Biotechnology: Challenges and opportunities for chemical engineers. AIChE J. 51: 690-695.
Costa AD, Carlos A, Pereira F (2001). Bioaccumulation of copper, zinc, cadmium and lead by Bacillus sp, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus subtilis. Braz J Microbiol. 32: 1-5.
Hong CH, Shan-shan P (2005). Bioremediation potential of spirulina: toxicity and biosorption studies of lead. J Zhejiang Univ Sci. 6B: 171-174.
Hussein H, Farag S, Kandil K, Moawad H (2004). Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Pseudomonads. Process Biochem. 40: 955-961.
Hussein H, Farag Ibrahim S, Kandeel K, Moawad H (2005). Biosorption of heavy metals from waste water using Pseudomonas sp. Electronic J Biotechnol. Available at www.ejb biotechnology.info/content/vol7/Issue 1/Full/2/ index.html.
Jung K, Bitton G, Koopman B (1996). Selective assay for heavy metal toxicity using a fluorogenic substrate. Environ Toxicol Chem. 15: 711-714.
Lopez Jimenez G, leborgne S (2003). Biofilms and adhesion protein in anaerobe bacteria isolated from Mexican gas pipelines. The 8th Int Petroleum Environ Conf. Abu Dhabi.
Lyer A, Mody K, Bhavanath J (2004). Accumulation of hexavalent chromium by an exopolysaccharide producing marine Enterobacter cloaceae.  Mar Pollut Bull. 49: 974-977.
Lyer A, Mody K, Bhavanath J (2004). Biosorption of heavy metals by a marine bacterium. Mar Pollut Bull. 50: 340-343.
Macaskie LE, Dean ACR (1984). Cadmium accumulation by a Citrobacter sp. J Gem Microbial. 130: 53-62.
Malekzadeh F, Farazmand A, Ghafourtian H, Shahamat M, Levin M, Colwell R.R, Colwell R.R (2002). Uranium accumulation by a bacterium isolated from electroplating effluent. World J Microb Biot. 18: 295-302
Malone CR (1989). The Yucca Mountain Project storage problems of high-level radioactive waste. Environ Scl Technol. 23: 1452.
Marques AM, Roca X, Simon-pujol MD, Fuste MC, Congregado F (1991). Uranium accumulation by Pseudomonas sp. EPS 5028. Appi Microbial Biotechnol. 35: 406-410.
Matagi SV, Swai D, Mugabe R (1998). A review of heavy metal removal mechanisms in wetlands. Afr J Trop Hydrobiol Fish. 8: 23-35.
Paul D, Pandey G, Pandey J, Rakesh K (2005). Accessing microbial diversity for bioremediation and environmental restoration. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 135-142.
Piotrowska-seget Z, Cycon M, Kozdroj J (2005). Metal-tolerant bacteria occurring in heavily polluted soil and mine spoil. Appl Soil Ecol. 28: 237-246.
Pongratz R, Klaus G (1999). Production of methylated mercury, lead, and cadmium by marine bacteria as a significant natural source for atmospheric heavy metals in polar regions. Chemosphere. 39: 89-102.
Spain A, Alm E (2003). Implications of microbial heavy metal tolerance in the environment. Rev Undergraduate Res. 2: 1-6.
Wang N (2004). Cell immobilization with calcium alginate. Available at www.glue.umd.edu/~ nsw/ench 485/lab7b.htm.
Wong PK, Lam KC, So CM (1993). Removal and recovery of Cu (II) from industrial effluent by immobilization cells of Pseudomonas putida II-11. Appl Microbial Biotechnol. 39: 127-131.
Zhaohui XU, Weon B, Mulchandani A, Rajesh K, Chen W (2002). Heavy metal removal by novel CBD-EC20 sorbents immobilized on cellulose. Biomacromolecules 3: 462-465.
Zouboulis AI (2004). Biosorption of toxic metals from aqueous solutions by bacteria strains isolated from metal-polluted soils. Process Biochem. 39: 909-916.